Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 
  • Users Online:115
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page


 
 Table of Contents  
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 29  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 106-110

Evaluation of analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in experimental analgesic models in mice


Department of Pharmacology, Topiwala National Medical College and Nair Hospital, Mumbai Central, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Web Publication15-Apr-2015

Correspondence Address:
Dr. Promod D Shankpal
213, 2nd Floor College Building, Nair Hospital Campus, Nair Hospital, Mumbai Central, Mumbai - 400 008, Maharashtra
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0970-5333.153589

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Background: Allopurinol and febuxostat are xanthine oxidase inhibitors which are used in the treatment of hyperuricemia and gout. Pain is one of the important symptoms in gout patients. The present study was to evaluate the analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in two analgesic models in mice. Materials and Methods: The analgesic activity of allopurinol (39 mg/kg) and febuxostat (15.6 mg/kg) was evaluated using central analgesic model of Eddy's hot plate and peripheral analgesic model of acetic acid induced writhing. Both drugs were compared with the positive control, pentazocine for a hot plate method and aspirin for the writhing method. Furthermore, both allopurinol and febuxostat were compared with each other. Results: Both allopurinol and febuxostat showed significant increase in reaction time at various time periods in hot plate method and also showed significant delay in onset of writhing as well as decrease in number of writhes in writhing method. As compared to positive control result, allopurinol and febuxostat result were lower. Febuxostat shows better analgesic activity as compared to that of allopurinol. Conclusion: Allopurinol and febuxostat exhibited analgesic activity in both central and peripheral models of pain.

Keywords: Allopurinol, Eddy′s hot plate method, febuxostat, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, reactive oxygen species, writhing method


How to cite this article:
Shankpal PD, Hotwani J H, Chitnis KA, Tadke DS, Kokani VR. Evaluation of analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in experimental analgesic models in mice. Indian J Pain 2015;29:106-10

How to cite this URL:
Shankpal PD, Hotwani J H, Chitnis KA, Tadke DS, Kokani VR. Evaluation of analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in experimental analgesic models in mice. Indian J Pain [serial online] 2015 [cited 2020 Feb 17];29:106-10. Available from: http://www.indianjpain.org/text.asp?2015/29/2/106/153589


  Introduction Top


Pain is an unpleasant sensation but a protective mechanism of our body. Analgesics are defined as substances, which decrease pain sensation by increasing pain threshold to external stimuli without altering consciousness. [1] Gout is a painful, metabolic disease that most often affects middle-aged to elderly men and postmenopausal women. It results from an increased body pool of urate with hyperuricemia. It typically is characterized by episodic acute and chronic arthritis caused by deposition of monosodium urate crystals in joints and connective tissue tophi. [2] The current management for acute gout include anti-inflammatory drugs such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), corticosteroids, and for chronic gout include urate-lowering treatment such as allopurinol, febuxostat, and probenecid. [3] NSAIDs and corticosteroids have many noted serious adverse effects. [4],[5] Therefore, analgesic drugs lacking the side effect as an alternative to NSAIDs and corticosteroids in the management of acute gout is on demand.

Allopurinol is a potent inhibitor of xanthine oxidase. It inhibits the transformation of hypoxanthine to xanthine and uric acid thereby reducing uric acid formation and purine degradation. [6] This leads to an increase in the concentration of hypoxanthine. Hypoxanthine is converted to inosine, inosine monophosphate (IMP), and consequently to adenosine via the purine salvage pathway. [7] Adenosine is a purine nucleoside that occurs naturally in all cells of the body. Its role in the modulation of pain has been confirmed by receptor-mediated action In spinal, supraspinal sites, and peripheral sites. [8] It may be related to the inhibition of neuronal conduction by: Increase in K + conductance; decrease in substance P and glutamate; [9] and attenuation of basal as well as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) induced nitric oxide production which is an excitatory neurotransmitter. [10]

Above metabolic effects of allopurinol have been demonstrated in the central nervous system and the periphery in animal studies. [11] Allopurinol was demonstrated to have anticonvulsant and anti-psychotic effects acting through above mechanism in animals and humans. [12],[13] Schmidt et al. (2008) [14] found that acute inhibition of xanthine oxidase with allopurinol produced a modest adenosine A1 receptor-mediated anti-nociceptive effect in common tests of chemical and thermal nociception in mice. Xanthine oxidase is also generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) by catalyzing the oxidative hydroxylation of purine substrates, [15] this ROS may also mediate acute pain transmission. [16] Thus, allopurinol may have analgesic activity due to adenosine modulation and inhibition of generation of ROS or both.

Studies in rodents have demonstrated that spinal or systemic administration of adenosine and adenosine analogs inhibits pain behaviors in response to noxious stimuli in a variety of test system, including acute nociceptive pain tests, inflammatory pain tests, peripheral and central neuropathic pain tests. [17],[18] Raising extracellular adenosine by inhibiting adenosine kinase (AK) in animal models induced an analgesic effect. [8],[19] Investigations performed in patients with acute perioperative pain or chronic neuropathic pain treated with intravenous adenosine or an intrathecal adenosine, have shown analgesic activity with longer duration. [20],[21]

Febuxostat is a newer orally administered, nonpurine, selective inhibitor of both oxidized and reduced form of xanthine oxidase approved for the management of chronic hyperuricemia in patients with gout. [22] There are no data available if it been evaluated for the analgesic activity. It may have an analgesic activity through the aforementioned mechanism.

Therefore, our study was aimed at evaluating the analgesic activity of both allopurinol and febuxostat in experimental analgesic models in mice, thus establishing the class effects of xanthine oxidase inhibitors.


  Materials and Methods Top


Swiss albino mice of either sex, weighing 15-20 g were used for the experiment. The mice were obtained from Haffkine Biopharma Corporation and were kept 3 mice/cage at room temperature of 25°C, humidity of 60%, and 12 h light and day cycle is maintained. Study was performed after obtaining the approval from the Institutional Animal Ethics Committee. Both allopurinol and febuxostat were obtained from Zydus Cadila, and their suspension was made in 1% carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) in distilled water for oral administration. Aspirin in pure powder form manufactured by Qualigen while pentazocine parental preparation manufactured by Biochem Pharmaceutical, both are obtained from the hospital pharmacy. A suspension of 1% CMC in distilled water was used as a vehicle. 0.6% acetic acid solution was administered intraperitoneally to induce writhing in mice.

Eddy's hot plate method

After 7 days of acclimatization, 24 animals were divided into four groups containing six mice each [Table 1]. Temperature was maintained at constant temperature of 55-56°C. The time taken by the animal for either licking the paw or withdrawal of the paws or jumping off the surface, whichever observed first, was taken as the end point. Reaction time was measured by stopwatch in 1/100 s increments and was taken before (baseline) and 30, 60, 90, and 120 min after the drug or vehicle administration in each animal. [23]
Table 1: Study groups in hot plate method

Click here to view


Writhing method

After a washout period of 7 days, the animals were used for writhing method [Table 2]. Groups of mice received the drug or the vehicle. After 60 min interval, 0.1 ml of a 0.6% solution of acetic acid was injected intraperitoneally to the mice to induce writhes. A writhe was indicated by a constriction that travels along the abdominal wall. The time of onset of writhing and the number of writhing in the following 10 min were recorded by stopwatch in 1/100 increment.
Table 2: Study groups in writhing method

Click here to view


Statistical analysis

One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by Tukeys multiple comparison test and repeated measures ANOVA followed by Dunnett test were used as a statistical method. P < 0.05 was considered significant.


  Results Top


Hot plate results

Both test drugs, allopurinol and febuxostat and positive control showed significant analgesic activity as compared to compared to vehicle control (P < 0.001). Both drugs showed increase in reaction time at various time intervals in hot plate method [Table 3], [Figure 1] and delay in onset of writhing as well as decrease in numbers of writhes in writhing method [Table 4] and [Table 5], [Figure 2] and [Figure 3]. The analgesic activity seen with pentazocine was significantly better as compared to test drugs (P < 0.001). The analgesic activity seen with febuxostat was better as compared to allopurinol (P < 0.05).
Figure 1: Comparison of reaction time between 1% carboxymethyl cellulose, pentazocine, allopurinol, and febuxostat

Click here to view
Figure 2: Comparison of time of onset of writhing between 1% carboxymethyl cellulose, aspirin, allopurinol, febuxostat

Click here to view
Figure 3: comparison of number of abdominal contraction between 1% carboxymethyl cellulose, aspirin, allopurinol, febuxostat

Click here to view
Table 3: Hot plate results

Click here to view
Table 4: Comparison of time of onset of writhing between the groups in seconds

Click here to view
Table 5: Comparison of number of writhes (abdominal contractions) and percentage of inhibition compared to that of control, between the groups

Click here to view



  Discussion Top


Gout is a painful, chronic inflammatory condition of the joints. Its prevalence has been increasing in recent years and is currently one of the most common types of inflammatory arthritis. [24] If not treated it may lead to chronic gouty arthropathy and deposition of urate crystals in soft tissues, forming tophi. Current standards for first-line treatment of acute attacks of gout include NSAIDs, colchicines, corticosteroids. Urate lowering treatment such as allopurinol, febuxostat, and probenecid are usually recommended after the acute attack has resolved. [25]

In our study, we have evaluated analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in experimental analgesic models in mice. Eddy's hot plate for central analgesic activity and acetic acid induced writhing test for peripheral analgesic activity, were used for evaluation of analgesic activity of allopurinol and febuxostat in our study. Pentazocine, an opioid agonist-antagonist was used as standard positive control for central hot plate test and aspirin was used as standard positive control for peripheral writhing test.

Our study showed that allopurinol and febuxostat have analgesic activity in both central analgesic model of the hot plate and peripheral analgesic model of acetic acid induced writhing. The analgesic activity seen with febuxostat is higher as compared to that of allopurinol in both the pain models. Schmidt et al. (2008) is also evaluated analgesic activity of allopurinol.

Allopurinol and febuxostat are an inhibitor of the enzyme xanthine oxidase, the final step in purine metabolism, converting hypoxanthine and xanthine into uric acid. The inhibition of xanthine oxidase leads to accumulation of hypoxanthine and xanthine. This favors the action of the enzyme hypoxanthine-guanine-phosphoribosyltransferase, which is responsible for purine salvage. This leads to a decrease in the systemic concentration of uric acid and an increase in the concentration of the precursors, hypoxanthine and xanthine. The hypoxanthine is converted to inosine, IMP and consequently to adenosine. [7] Xanthine oxidase is also responsible for generation of ROS by catalyzing the oxidative hydroxylation of purine substrates, [15] ROS have been proposed to mediate acute pain transmission. [16] The proposed mechanism of allopurinol and febuxostat as an analgesic is the modulation of adenosine levels and inhibition of production of ROS.

Adenosine exerts analgesic activity at peripheral and central sites which may be related to the inhibition of neuronal conduction by increase in K + conductance; decrease in release of substance P and glutamate; [9] and attenuation of basal a well as NMDA-induced nitric oxide production which is an excitatory neurotransmitter. [10] Agents inhibiting a major adenosine metabolizing enzyme, AK, are very effective anti-nociceptive agents in a wide range of pain models. [19]

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are used as an analgesic, which are associated with adverse effects such as gastritis, stomach ulcers, and gastric bleeding, bleeding disorder. On prolonged use of NSAIDs, it will cause renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, asthma, vasomotor rhinitis, angioneurotic edema, urticaria, laryngeal edema, and even cardiovascular collapse. Cardiovascular risks of NSAIDs, especially COX-2 inhibitors have become a major focus of attention over the past several years. [26] They may be contraindicated in some patients due to coexistent medical problems, especially in the elderly, as the majority of these patients have preexisting conditions such as diabetes, renal, cardiovascular or gastrointestinal diseases. [27] Thus, the use of xanthine oxidase inhibitors such as allopurinol and febuxostat over that of uricosuric agents such as probenecid and benzbromarone in long-term treatment of gout, may provide an added advantage of substitution or lowering the dose of NSAIDs, thus, avoiding the side effects of long-term administration of NSAIDs. They may be useful to treat pain syndromes in humans.

Furthermore, xanthine oxidase inhibitors, allopurinol and febuxostat may be combined with other analgesics which act predominantly on nonadenosine systems in the management of gout. They may also provide useful adjunct therapies in chronic diseases such as sickle cell anemia and diabetic neuropathy, where their possible dual actions on ROS and adenosine levels may be particularly helpful in improving vascular endothelial function and limiting pain. [28]

However, further animal studies using other pain models should be done. Human studies should also be carried to throw further light on the effect of xanthine oxidase inhibitors on pain. In our study, we did not measure the cerebrospinal fluid levels of adenosine and the levels of ROS, which would have confirmed the mechanism of action for the analgesic activity of xanthine oxidase inhibitors.

 
  References Top

1.
Rathmell JP, Fields HL. Pain: Pathophysiology and Management, Harrison's Principals of Internal Medicine. 18 th ed., Vol. 1, Ch. 11. New Delhi: McGrew Hill Publication; 2012. p. 93-101.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Schumacher HR, Chen LX. Gout and other crystal-associated arthropathies. In: Fauci AS, Jameson JL, Hauser SL, Kasper DL, Longo DL, Loscalzo J, editors. Harrison's Principles of Internal Medicine. 18 th ed. New Delhi: McGraw-Hill; 2012. p. 2837-42.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Tilo G, Emer S, Garret AF. Anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic agents: Pharmacotherapy in gout. In: Brunton L, Chabner B, Knollman B, editors. Goodman and Gilman's the Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics. 12 th ed. New Delhi: McGrew Hill; 2011. p. 398-415.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
García Rodríguez LA, Barreales Tolosa L. Risk of upper gastrointestinal complications among users of traditional NSAIDs and COXIBs in the general population. Gastroenterology 2007;132:498-506.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
García Rodríguez LA, Varas-Lorenzo C, Maguire A, González-Pérez A. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs and the risk of myocardial infarction in the general population. Circulation 2004 22;109:3000-6.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Day RO, Graham GG, Hicks M, McLachlan AJ, Stocker SL, Williams KM. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of allopurinol and oxypurinol. Clin Pharmacokinet 2007;46:623-44.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Sawynok J, Liu XJ. Adenosine in the spinal cord and periphery: Release and regulation of pain. Prog Neurobiol 2003;69:313-40.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Sawynok J. Adenosine receptor activation and nociception. Eur J Pharmacol 1998;347:1-11.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Bhardwaj A, Northington FJ, Koehler RC, Stiefel T, Hanley DF, Traystman RJ. Adenosine modulates N-methyl-D-aspartate-stimulated hippocampal nitric oxide production in vivo. Stroke 1995;26:1627-33.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Marro PJ, Mishra OP, Delivoria-Papadopoulos M. Effect of allopurinol on brain adenosine levels during hypoxia in newborn piglets. Brain Res 2006;1073-1074:444-50.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Wada Y, Hasegawa H, Nakamura M, Yamaguchi N. Anticonvulsant effect of allopurinol on hippocampal-kindled seizures. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 1992;42:899-901.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Zagnoni PG, Bianchi A, Zolo P, Canger R, Cornaggia C, D'Alessandro P, et al. Allopurinol as add-on therapy in refractory epilepsy: A double-blind placebo-controlled randomized study. Epilepsia 1994;35:107-12.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Borges F, Fernandes E, Roleira F. Progress towards the discovery of xanthine oxidase inhibitors. Curr Med Chem 2002;9:195-217.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Schmidth AP, Bohmer AE, Schallenberger C, Porciúncula LO, Elisabetsky E, Lara DR, et al. Anti-nociceptive properties of the xanthine oxidase inhibitor allopurinol in mice: role of A1 adenosine receptors. British J Pharmacol 2009;156:163-72.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Lee I, Kim HK, Kim JH, Chung K, Chung JM. The role of reactive oxygen species in capsaicin-induced mechanical hyperalgesia and in the activities of dorsal horn neurons. Pain 2007;133:9-17.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Lavand'homme PM, Eisenach JC. Exogenous and endogenous adenosine enhance the spinal antiallodynic effects of morphine in a rat model of neuropathic pain. Pain 1999;80:31-6.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Sjölund KF, von Heijne M, Hao JX, Xu XJ, Sollevi A, Wiesenfeld-Hallin Z. Intrathecal administration of the adenosine A1 receptor agonist R-phenylisopropyl adenosine reduces presumed pain behaviour in a rat model of central pain. Neurosci Lett 1998;243:89-92.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Jarvis MF, Yu H, McGaraughty S, Wismer CT, Mikusa J, Zhu C, et al. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects of A-286501, a novel orally active adenosine kinase inhibitor. Pain 2002;96: 107-18.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Rae CP, Mansfield MD, Dryden C, Kinsella J. Analgesic effect of adenosine on ischaemic pain in human volunteers. Br J Anaesth 1999;82:427-8.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lynch ME, Clark AJ, Sawynok J. Intravenous adenosine alleviates neuropathic pain: A double blind placebo controlled crossover trial using an enriched enrolment design. Pain 2003;103:111-7.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Pascual E, Sivera F, Yasothan U, Kirkpatrick P. Febuxostat. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2009;8:191-2.  Back to cited text no. 21
[PUBMED]    
22.
Vogel H. Drug Discovery and Evaluation of Pharmacological Assay. 2 nd ed. Berlin: Springer; 2002. p. 391-2.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Richette P, Bardin T. Gout. Lancet 2010 23;375:318-28.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Cronstein BN, Terkeltaub R. The inflammatory process of gout and its treatment. Arthritis Res Ther 2006;8 Suppl 1:S3.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Zhou YL. In: Bradley WG, Dareff RB, Fenichel G, Janleoric J, editors. Neurology in Clinical Practice. 5 th ed. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann Deutschland; 2008. p. 899-913.   Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Pascual E, Sivera F. Why is gout so poorly managed? Ann Rheum Dis 2007;66:1269-70.  Back to cited text no. 26
[PUBMED]    
27.
Inkster ME, Cotter MA, Cameron NE. Treatment with the xanthine oxidase inhibitor, allopurinol, improves nerve and vascular function in diabetic rats. Eur J Pharmacol 2007;561:63-71.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Wood KC, Granger DN. Sickle cell disease: Role of reactive oxygen and nitrogen metabolites. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2007;34:926-32.  Back to cited text no. 28
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3], [Table 4], [Table 5]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Me...
Results
Discussion
References
Article Figures
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed2052    
    Printed35    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded244    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal