|
 
 |
| REVIEW ARTICLE |
|
| Year : 2016 | Volume
: 30
| Issue : 3 | Page : 151-157 |
|
Kinesiology taping as an adjunct for pain management: A review of literature and evidence
Gourav Banerjee, Michelle Briggs, Mark I Johnson
Centre for Pain Research, Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University; Leeds Pallium Research Group, Leeds, United Kingdom
| Date of Web Publication | 10-Jan-2017 |
Correspondence Address:
Gourav Banerjee
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, LS1 3HE
United Kingdom
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/0970-5333.198005
Current evidence-based practice guidelines for the management of nonacute persistent and recurring musculoskeletal-related pain have emphasized the use of holistic multidisciplinary approaches including nonpharmacological therapies. Kinesiology taping is a simple, economical, easy-to-apply, nondrug therapeutic technique that is used by health-care professionals for managing and rehabilitating musculoskeletal injuries. High-quality research on kinesiology taping is limited, although recent evidence suggests that kinesiology taping may have a small effect in mitigating pain and may be associated with mild cutaneous side effects. We present a review of the principles of kinesiology taping and an evaluation of research on its efficacy to catalyze discussion among clinicians about the merits of kinesiology taping as an adjunct for pain management. Keywords: Elastic therapeutic taping, nonpharmacological adjunct, pain management
How to cite this article:
Banerjee G, Briggs M, Johnson MI. Kinesiology taping as an adjunct for pain management: A review of literature and evidence. Indian J Pain 2016;30:151-7 |
How to cite this URL:
Banerjee G, Briggs M, Johnson MI. Kinesiology taping as an adjunct for pain management: A review of literature and evidence. Indian J Pain [serial online] 2016 [cited 2020 May 26];30:151-7. Available from: http://www.indianjpain.org/text.asp?2016/30/3/151/198005 |
| Introduction | |  |
Universal health coverage in India continues to remain poor despite a significant growth in the economy. [1],[2] India spends only 4% of its total gross domestic product on its public health system, lower than other emerging economies such as Brazil, Russia, China, and South Africa. [3] India was ranked in the lowest quintile of 166 countries on health outcomes and spending, [4] and this places a reliance on private delivery of health care and subsequent inequalities for access to health-care services. [1],[2] It is, therefore, necessary to explore effective yet economic alternatives for treatment purposes.
Unrelieved chronic pain is a global health-care problem with prevalence of mean SD 30.3% ± 11.7%. [5] A cross-sectional telephone survey in eight Indian cities estimated the overall point prevalence of chronic pain to be 13%. [6] The prevalence of musculoskeletal-related pain in the national capital region and Pune was estimated as 25.9% [7] and 14.1%, [8] respectively. Considering India's population, [9] it can be assumed that a significant number of Indians are experiencing chronic pain at any given time. [6] In addition, the financial burden of pain that includes costs associated with health care, sickness absence, and benefits is also significant, [10] and it is estimated to be higher than the annual costs of heart disease, cancer, and diabetes. [11] In 2004, the International Association for the Study of Pain stated that the management of pain need not involve advanced costly interventions but low-cost therapies that are effective and available to the health-care professionals, patients, and their families. [10]
Pharmacotherapy is often the primary treatment for the pain of recent onset, and many people obtain nonprescription analgesic medication. [6] However, long-term use of analgesic medication is not desirable because of adverse effects. Exercise, manual therapy, patient education, and self-management are recommended as primary interventions for many musculoskeletal conditions including nonspecific persistent low back pain and chronic pain associated with knee osteoarthritis. [12],[13] Moreover, nonpharmacological interventions are used as adjuncts to core treatment within a biopsychosocial model of care to improve the activities of daily living and quality of life (QoL). [14],[15] The World Health Organization advocates the use of patient education and inexpensive, easy to use, self-management techniques as this empowers individuals to take control of the management of their chronic pain leading to better outcomes in the longer term. [16]
Kinesiology taping is an inexpensive, easy-to-administer technique that involves the application of elastic adhesive tape on the skin. The technique has become popular because of its use by high-profile sports persons for injury prevention and rehabilitation. [17] Kinesiology taping is also used to manage cancer-related lymphedema [18],[19] and neuromuscular-related spasticity in conditions that include stroke, [18],[19] cerebral palsy, [20] and multiple sclerosis. [21] Kinesiology taping was developed in the 1970s to facilitate healing of musculoskeletal-related injuries, [22] and at present, it is being used by nurses, physiotherapists, chiropractors, osteopaths, and sports therapists. The purpose of this review is to discuss the potential value of kinesiology taping for the management of pain.
| Kinesiology Taping | | |
The use of taping techniques for the rehabilitation of musculoskeletal-related injuries spans decades. [23] These techniques involve the application of nonelastic cotton zinc oxide-based adhesive tape to joints to provide structural support, biomechanical alignment, restriction of movement, and compression for the management of injuries. [23],[24],[25]
Kinesiology taping differs from these traditional taping techniques. Kinesiology taping uses a latex-free cotton-based tape with polymer elastic strands woven throughout containing heat-sensitive acrylic adhesive. [26],[27] The elastic properties of the tape mean that it can be longitudinally stretched up to 55-60% of its resting length, and this gives the treatment its unique identity because kinesiology tape can support tissues and joints without restricting the movements of structures around the joint. [26],[27] An advantage over standard taping techniques is that kinesiology tape can be applied where rigid tapes cannot be conveniently applied, for example, head and neck, breast, underarm, and abdomen, resulting in better tolerated and fewer adverse effects. [28],[29] Precautions include open wounds, dermatological diseases, and vascular diseases such as deep vein thrombosis, allergy to adhesive tape, and frail skin susceptible to irritation and damage as seen in the elderly. [26]
In India, kinesiology tape is available without prescription and over-the-counter for approximately ₹1000 for a 5 m strip of 5 cm wide tape. Proprietary names for kinesiology tape include Kinesio® Tex Tape, Rocktape, and Tiger K Tape® . There appears to be minor variations in the physical characteristics of different brands of kinesiology tape. Kinesiology tape is available in a variety of shapes, sizes, colors, and patterns, which give the tape its distinctive appearance [Figure 1]. Some manufactures have claimed that the colors of the tape influence treatment outcome although there is no evidence in support. Kinesiology tape is resistant to water, so it can be worn while showering, bathing, swimming, and during physical activity. [26],[27] The duration of a course of kinesiology taping treatment varies according to the condition being treated, although generally, kinesiology tape is replaced for every 3-5 days. [26],[27] From a clinician's perspective, it appears that kinesiology taping is tailored according to the need (s) of the patient using a trial and error approach based on previous clinical experience. | Figure 1: Distinctive appearance of blue- and beige-colored kinesiology tapes. Figure showing woven polymer elastic strands when removed from the paper backing.
Click here to view |
| Principles of Kinesiology Taping Practice | | |
A wide variety of techniques have been described by the developer, manufacturers, and educators of kinesiology taping including techniques for pain relief, musculoskeletal rehabilitation, lymphatic drainage, postural correction and sports performance. Kinesiology taping techniques include neuromuscular taping, kinesthetic taping, and lymph taping. In general, kinesiology tape is applied to produce traction on the skin to produce skin convolutions (wrinkles) caused by the recoil of the tape due to its elastic properties [Figure 2]b. This is achieved by either stretching the tape during application while tissue is not stretched (i.e., in a neutral position) [Figure 2]a or positioning the body part to stretch tissue (e.g., in a flexed position) and applying tape without stretch [Figure 2]b. [26] Opinion leaders claim that which technique is used depends on clinical assessment and the purpose of the treatment. [17]
Often, kinesiology taping is used to relieve musculoskeletal pain, and the goal of treatment is to provide support to an injured or overused muscle. In this instance, the tape is removed from its paper backing and applied with a very light stretch (20% approx.) from insertion to origin of the muscle along its direction of orientation; the skin, fascia and muscles are placed in stretched position during the kinesiology tape application. It is claimed that this will produce an eccentric pull in the fascia and muscle which will inhibit muscle contraction, thereby promoting healing and relief from pain. [26],[30] Where increased muscle contraction with full range of motion is desired, kinesiology tape is applied from the origin to insertion of the muscle with a moderate stretch (25-50% approximately); this is theorized to produce concentric pull on the fascia and underlying muscles. [26],[31] For the purpose of rehabilitation following ligament or tendon injury, kinesiology tape is applied with medium to full stretch (50-75% approximately) while the individual maintains a functional joint position during application to target the stimulation of mechanoreceptors for improving proprioception. [26] Other common techniques of kinesiology taping include fascial movement taping, sports, and power taping. [32] | Figure 2: (a) Demonstration of kinesiology taping for knee pain. Blue-colored tape applied with approximately 20% stretch (with the knee extended) and white-colored tape stretched horizontally approximately 50%. (b) Demonstration of skin convolutions produced by kinesiology taping for low back pain. Beige-colored tape applied without any stretch and white-colored tape stretched horizontally approximately 50%. (c) Demonstration of kinesiology taping for forearm edema. Strips of beige- and white-colored tapes applied in a crisscross pattern directed toward the base of thumb with minimum stretch. "Base" of the beige-colored tape placed medially in the vicinity of cubital nodes.
Click here to view |
Scissors can be used to cut kinesiology tape into various shapes. For example, fan shapes are used to reduce edema and are applied with light stretch (0-15% approximately) directed toward lymph ducts to promote drainage [Figure 2]c. It is believed that fan shapes optimize the areas of low pressure underneath the epidermis and that this assists drainage of the interstitial fluids and reduces pressure on the nociceptors, thereby reducing swelling and pain. [26]
Application of kinesiology tape involves prior preparation of the skin (e.g., removal of dirt, oil, cream, etc.,) and the tape itself (e.g., rounding the edges of tape and avoiding touching the adhesive). It is suggested that the skin should be cleaned, the hairs must be trimmed, and the tape must be applied without any tension at its ends for better adherence on to the skin and for easier peeling of the tape afterward. [26] Notwithstanding, complete shaving should be avoided as it is desirable to have some lengths of hair (in mm) for the tape to stick to and stimulate skin mechanoreceptors by pulling on the hairs. After use, it is suggested that the tape should be carefully removed from top to down in the direction of body hairs to avoid hair pulling and skin irritation. [26] Moisturizer may be used if the skin becomes red and tender.
There is, however, a paucity of scientific evidence on the effect of design and technique variations on outcome. A critique of the fundamental physiological principles and mechanisms proposed for kinesiology tape is needed.
| Mechanisms of Action | | |
A variety of mechanisms of action have been proposed for the putative actions of kinesiology taping [Table 1]. These mechanisms are largely speculative, and theories are yet to be tested empirically. | Table 1: Summary of major purported mechanisms of action of kinesiology taping
Click here to view |
The elastic nature of kinesiology tape means that it may generate convolutions (wrinkles) of the skin when applied to certain regions of the body. It is claimed that this causes microscopic lifting of the skin from the underlying tissue and that this improves microcirculation of the blood and lymph assisting in the drainage of analgesic substances and edema. [26] Studies evaluating the effect of kinesiology taping on microcirculation of blood and lymph are limited, conflicting, and inconclusive. [40],[41],[42],[43]
It has been suggested that the elastic nature of kinesiology tape causes stretching and recoiling of the skin during movement, and that this stimulates low-threshold cutaneous mechanoreceptors, Golgi tendon organs, and muscle spindles. [26] Resultant activity in low-threshold afferents could cause central inhibition of nociceptive transmission and a reduction in pain in line with the Gate Control Theory of Pain, [44] and alter proprioception and postural awareness. [18],[19],[31],[35],[37],[39],[45],[46] Mechanical forces produced by kinesiology tape may reduce stiffness in fascia occurring, for example, during acute inflammation and when the fascia tightens and loses flexibility. [30],[47] Fascia consists of viscoelastic connective tissue matrix throughout the body and it is richly innervated with mechanosensitive receptors that signal forces from other soft tissues and structures. [48],[49],[50],[51],[52],[53],[54],[55],[56] It is proposed that kinesiology taping over hypothesized myofascial meridians [57] can help mitigate pain and improve muscle performance, range of motion, and posture. [58] At present, there is a paucity of research evidence to support the notion that kinesiology taping influences fascia.
It seems likely that in some instances kinesiology taping effects are being mediated as an "elastic splint" by providing structural support to unload incumbent forces on soft tissues and joints, for example, shoulder impingement syndrome. [31] Kinesiology taping is also being used to apply correctional forces in cases such as patellofemoral pain syndrome. [25],[29] It is likely that there is a large psychological effect associated with kinesiology taping including an expectation of benefit from being given a treatment. [39]
| Clinical Efficacy | | |
We have conducted an evaluation of research on clinical efficacy of kinesiology taping for pain and related musculoskeletal outcomes. Systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis with or without meta-analysis on kinesiology taping for clinical outcomes, primarily pain relief, were sought by searching the following in January 2016: MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, OTseeker, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. Keywords used were Kinesio* tap*, k-tap*, kinesthetic tap*, lymph taping, and elastic therapeutic tap*. Titles and abstracts of studies published in English or translated into English were screened by GB, and full reports were obtained.
The search identified 19 systematic reviews and 1 pooled analysis [Table 2]. In total there were 90 studies with 3081 participants that predominantly evaluated the efficacy of kinesiology taping for improving pain and function in musculoskeletal conditions in noncancer populations. In general, reviewers report insufficient evidence to judge the outcome because of a limited number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and those that exist have small sample sizes. A systematic review with meta-analysis on the effect of kinesiology taping on skeletal muscle strength noted that studies of lower methodological quality tended to report positive outcomes. [59] Evidence in more recent systematic reviews suggest that kinesiology taping may have a small effect in reducing musculoskeletal-related pain and may not be superior to other treatments when used as standalone. [31],[36],[39],[60],[61] Kinesiology taping, however, could be a useful adjunct to mainline therapies for pain management in conditions that include patellofemoral pain syndrome, rotator cuff tendinopathy, and lateral ankle sprain. [25],[28],[29],[31],[37],[39] Kinesiology taping may also enhance proprioception which is suggestive of its role in the prevention and rehabilitation of sports-related soft tissue injuries. [28]
An evaluation of the research against the Grade Practice Recommendations [66] suggests that there is only level C evidence for clinical efficacy because of inconsistent findings from the systematic reviews and lack of high quality robust RCTs.
Kinesiology taping is also used to alleviate lymphedema and associated outcome measures in cancer patients. We have reported the initial findings of a systematic review that found positive outcomes for kinesiology taping for breast cancer-related lymphedema and associated outcomes including limb movability and QoL in 5/7 studies with controlled groups and in all studies without a comparison group. [67]
| Conclusion | | |
Kinesiology taping is a simple low-cost treatment option that has the potential to be useful in the management of a variety of painful conditions. At present, kinesiology taping is not a part of mainstream physiotherapy or nursing pain management practice because there is a lack of consistent evidence for efficacy. Nevertheless, kinesiology taping may have a role as an adjunct as adverse effects appear to be few. Further research appears necessary.
Financial support and sponsorship
This project was financially supported by The Jane Tomlinson Appeal.
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References | | |
| 1. | Balarajan Y, Selvaraj S, Subramanian SV. Health care and equity in India. Lancet 2011;377:505-15.  |
| 2. | Bali AS, Ramesh M. Mark time: India′s march to universal health care coverage. Soc Policy Adm 2015;49:718-37. |
| 3. | |
| 4. | |
| 5. | Elzahaf RA, Tashani OA, Unsworth BA, Johnson MI. The prevalence of chronic pain with an analysis of countries with a Human Development Index less than 0.9: A systematic review without meta-analysis. Curr Med Res Opin 2012;28:1221-9. |
| 6. | Dureja GP, Jain PN, Shetty N, Mandal SP, Prabhoo R, Joshi M, et al. Prevalence of chronic pain, impact on daily life, and treatment practices in India. Pain Pract 2014;14:E51-62. |
| 7. | Bihari V, Kesavachandran C, Pangtey BS, Srivastava AK, Mathur N. Musculoskeletal pain and its associated risk factors in residents of National Capital Region. Indian J Occup Environ Med 2011;15:59-63. [ PUBMED]  |
| 8. | Joshi VL, Chopra A. Is there an urban-rural divide? Population surveys of rheumatic musculoskeletal disorders in the Pune region of India using the COPCORD Bhigwan model. J Rheumatol 2009;36:614-22. |
| 9. | New Delhi: The Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India; c2010-2011. Available from: http://www.censusindia.gov.in/. [Last cited on 2016 Apr 07]. |
| 10. | |
| 11. | Gaskin DJ, Richard P. The economic costs of pain in the United States. J Pain 2012;13:715-24. |
| 12. | Savigny P, Kuntze S, Watson P, Underwood M, Ritchie G, Cotterell M, et al. Low back pain: Early management of persistent non-specific low back pain. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners; 2009. p. 14. |
| 13. | Conaghan PG, Dickson J, Grant RL; Guideline Development Group. Care and management of osteoarthritis in adults: Summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 2008;336:502-3. |
| 14. | Mannerkorpi K, Henriksson C. Non-pharmacological treatment of chronic widespread musculoskeletal pain. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 2007;21:513-34. |
| 15. | Nicholas MK, George SZ. Psychologically informed interventions for low back pain: An update for physical therapists. Phys Ther 2011;91:765-76. |
| 16. | Hoffman AJ. Enhancing self-efficacy for optimized patient outcomes through the theory of symptom self-management. Cancer Nurs 2013;36:E16-26. |
| 17. | Johannes L. Aches and Claims: Putting on the Stripes to Ease Pain. The Wall Street J 2010 April 27;Sect. A:1. (Col. 1). |
| 18. | Kalron A, Bar-Sela S. A systematic review of the effectiveness of Kinesio Taping - Fact or fashion? Eur J Phys Rehabil Med 2013;49:699-709. |
| 19. | Morris D, Jones D, Ryan H, Ryan CG. The clinical effects of Kinesio ® Tex taping: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract 2013;29:259-70. |
| 20. | da Costa CS, Rodrigues FS, Leal FM, Rocha NA. Pilot study: Investigating the effects of Kinesio Taping ® on functional activities in children with cerebral palsy. Dev Neurorehabil 2013;16:121-8. |
| 21. | Cortesi M, Cattaneo D, Jonsdottir J. Effect of kinesio taping on standing balance in subjects with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study\m{1}. NeuroRehabilitation 2011;28:365-72. |
| 22. | |
| 23. | Constantinou M, Brown M. Therapeutic Taping for Musculoskeletal Conditions. Chatswood, New South Wales, Australia: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2010. |
| 24. | Campolo M, Babu J, Dmochowska K, Scariah S, Varughese J. A comparison of two taping techniques (kinesio and mcconnell) and their effect on anterior knee pain during functional activities. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2013;8:105-10. |
| 25. | Chang WD, Chen FC, Lee CL, Lin HY, Lai PT. Effects of kinesio taping versus mcconnell taping for patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2015;2015:471208. |
| 26. | Kase K, Wallis J, Kase T, International KTA, McDuffie M. Clinical Therapeutic Applications of the Kinesio Taping Method. 3 rd ed. USA: Kinesio, LLC; 2013. |
| 27. | |
| 28. | Wilson B, Bialocerkowski A. The effects of kinesiotape applied to the lateral aspect of the ankle: Relevance to ankle sprains - A systematic review. PLoS One 2015;10:e0124214. |
| 29. | Beatriz LA, Rafael MM. Kinesio taping and patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review. Cent Eur J Sport Sci Med 2015;9:47-54. |
| 30. | Hammer WI. Functional Soft-tissue Examination and Treatment by Manual Methods. Sudbury, Massachusetts, USA: Jones and Bartlett Learning; 2007. |
| 31. | Desjardins-Charbonneau A, Roy JS, Dionne CE, Desmeules F. The efficacy of taping for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Sports Phys Ther 2015;10:420-33. |
| 32. | Rocktape: Sport Taping Applications and PowerTaping™ Performance Applications; c2008-2016. Available from: https://www.rocktape.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/RockTape-Rehab-Taping-Instructions.pdf. [Last cited on 2016 Apr 05]. |
| 33. | Bassett KT, Lingman SA, Ellis RF. The use and treatment of kinaesthetic taping for musculoskeletal conditions: A systematic review. N Z J Physiother 2010;38:56-62. |
| 34. | Mostafavifar M, Wertz J, Borchers J. A systematic review of the effectiveness of kinesio taping for musculoskeletal injury. Phys Sportsmed 2012;40:33-40. |
| 35. | Williams S, Whatman C, Hume PA, Sheerin K. Kinesio taping in treatment and prevention of sports injuries: A meta-analysis of the evidence for its effectiveness. Sports Med 2012;42:153-64. |
| 36. | Parreira Pdo C, Costa Lda C, Hespanhol LC Jr., Lopes AD, Costa LO. Current evidence does not support the use of kinesio taping in clinical practice: A systematic review. J Physiother 2014;60:31-9. |
| 37. | Artioli DP, Bertolini GR. Kinesio taping: Application and results on pain: Systematic review. Fisioter Pesqui 2014;21:94-9. |
| 38. | Ristow O, Pautke C, Kehl V, Koerdt S, Hahnefeld L, Hohlweg-Majert B. Kinesiologic taping reduces morbidity after oral and maxillofacial surgery: A pooled analysis. Physiother Theory Pract 2014;30:390-8. |
| 39. | Lim EC, Tay MG. Kinesio taping in musculoskeletal pain and disability that lasts for more than 4 weeks: Is it time to peel off the tape and throw it out with the sweat? A systematic review with meta-analysis focused on pain and also methods of tape application. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:1558-66. |
| 40. | Miller M, Klawon R, Lininger M, Cheatham C, Michael T. A preliminary investigation into the effect of kinesio and athletic tape on skin blood flow changes. J Strength Cond Res 2011;25:S57-8. |
| 41. | Stedge HL, Kroskie RM, Docherty CL. Kinesio taping and the circulation and endurance ratio of the gastrocnemius muscle. J Athl Train 2012;47:635-42. |
| 42. | Woodward KA, Unnithan V, Hopkins ND. Forearm skin blood flow after kinesiology taping in healthy soccer players: An exploratory investigation. J Athl Train 2015;50:1069-75. |
| 43. | Aguilar-Ferrándiz ME, Castro-Sánchez AM, Matarán-Peñarrocha GA, Guisado-Barrilao R, García-Ríos MC, Moreno-Lorenzo C. A randomized controlled trial of a mixed Kinesio taping-compression technique on venous symptoms, pain, peripheral venous flow, clinical severity and overall health status in postmenopausal women with chronic venous insufficiency. Clin Rehabil 2014;28:69-81. |
| 44. | D′Mello R, Dickenson AH. Spinal cord mechanisms of pain. Br J Anaesth 2008;101:8-16. |
| 45. | Lephart S, Fu F. The role of proprioception in the treatment of sports injuries. Sports Exerc Injury 1995;1:96-102. |
| 46. | Bark K, Wheeler JW, Premakumar S, Cutkosky MR, editors. Comparison of skin stretch and vibrotactile stimulation for feedback of proprioceptive information. Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environments and Teleoperator Systems IEEE. Reno, Nevada, United States of America: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers; 2008. p. 71-8. |
| 47. | Findley T, Chaudhry H, Stecco A, Roman M. Fascia research - A narrative review. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012;16:67-75. |
| 48. | Stecco C, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Duparc F, De Caro R. The fascia: The forgotten structure. Ital J Anat Embryol 2011;116:127-38. |
| 49. | Langevin HM, Cornbrooks CJ, Taatjes DJ. Fibroblasts form a body-wide cellular network. Histochem Cell Biol 2004;122:7-15. |
| 50. | Langevin HM. Connective tissue: A body-wide signaling network? Med Hypotheses 2006;66:1074-7. |
| 51. | DellaGrotte J, Ridi R, Landi M, Stephens J. Postural improvement using core integration to lengthen myofascia. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2008;12:231-45. |
| 52. | Benjamin M. The fascia of the limbs and back - A review. J Anat 2009;214:1-18. |
| 53. | Huijing PA. Epimuscular myofascial force transmission: A historical review and implications for new research. International Society of Biomechanics Muybridge Award Lecture, Taipei, 2007. J Biomech 2009;42:9-21. |
| 54. | Stecco C, Macchi V, Porzionato A, Morra A, Parenti A, Stecco A, et al. The ankle retinacula: Morphological evidence of the proprioceptive role of the fascial system. Cells Tissues Organs 2010;192:200-10. |
| 55. | Findley T, Chaudhry H, Dhar S. Transmission of muscle force to fascia during exercise. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2015;19:119-23. |
| 56. | Schleip R, Jäger H, Klingler W. What is ′fascia′? A review of different nomenclatures. J Bodyw Mov Ther 2012;16:496-502. |
| 57. | Myers TW. Anatomy Trains: Myofascial Meridians for Manual and Movement Therapists. London, United Kingdom: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2009. |
| 58. | |
| 59. | Csapo R, Alegre LM. Effects of Kinesio(®) taping on skeletal muscle strength-A meta-analysis of current evidence. J Sci Med Sport 2015;18:450-6. |
| 60. | Montalvo AM, Cara EL, Myer GD. Effect of kinesiology taping on pain in individuals with musculoskeletal injuries: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Sportsmed 2014;42:48-57. |
| 61. | Vanti C, Bertozzi L, Gardenghi I, Turoni F, Guccione AA, Pillastrini P. Effect of taping on spinal pain and disability: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Phys Ther 2015;95:493-506. |
| 62. | Méndez-Rebolledo G, Gatica-Rojas V, Cuevas-Contreras D, Sánchez-Leyton C. Effects of kinesio tape in rehabilitation of patients with patellofemoral pain syndrome: A systematic review. Fisioterapia 2014;36:280-7. |
| 63. | Hamneshin Behbahani S, Arab AM, Nejad L. Systematic review: Effects of using kinesio tape on treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Phys Treat Specif Phys Ther J 2014;4:115-22. |
| 64. | Dong W, Goost H, Lin XB, Burger C, Paul C, Wang ZL, et al. Treatments for shoulder impingement syndrome: A PRISMA systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 2015;94:e510. |
| 65. | Grampurohit N, Pradhan S, Kartin D. Efficacy of adhesive taping as an adjunct to physical rehabilitation to influence outcomes post-stroke: A systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil 2015;22:72-82. |
| 66. | |
| 67. | Banerjee G, Rose A, Briggs M, Johnson M. Kinesiology Taping as a Novel Adjunct in Oncology and Palliative Care? British Psychosocial Oncology Society 2016 Annual Conference; 03/03/2016; Madingley Hall, University of Cambridge, United Kingdom: Wiley Online Library; 2016. p. 22. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|
Search Pubmed for